A Next-Generation Fighter Jet Built for Redundancy and Range
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. military has taken the wraps off a bold new concept: the F-55 fighter jet, a proposed next-generation aircraft designed to overcome what some defense experts call the greatest vulnerability in the current F-35 program—its single-engine design. Introduced publicly by former President Donald Trump during a high-level business roundtable in Qatar earlier this month, the F-55 is envisioned as a twin-engine evolution of the F-35 Lightning II, built for greater safety, extended range, and enhanced combat survivability.
During his remarks, Trump emphasized the critical advantage of engine redundancy in military aviation. “Pilots don’t want to fly into enemy territory with just one engine,” he said. “You wouldn’t get on a 747 with one engine, would you?” Trump claimed credit for urging the Department of Defense to push for a new airframe with dual engines and enhanced combat performance.
From F-35 to F-55: A Leap in Complexity
Despite its political origins, the F-55 proposal has sparked legitimate debate inside defense circles. The F-35, widely known as the most advanced stealth fighter in active service, has long faced criticism for its maintenance costs, complex systems, and the inherent risk of a single-engine design in combat. The idea of building a twin-engine variant—effectively creating an all-new aircraft—would address those concerns, but at a steep cost.
Defense analysts point out that engineering a twin-engine version of the F-35 is not a minor modification. It would require a complete redesign of the aircraft’s internal architecture, affecting its aerodynamics, weight distribution, weapons bays, cooling systems, and fuel efficiency. Experts warn that such a redesign could take decades to complete and cost tens of billions of dollars.
Budget Concerns and Strategic Ambitions
The Department of Defense has not yet formally confirmed funding or procurement plans for the F-55, but sources inside the Pentagon say the idea is being reviewed at the concept development level. With national defense budgets already stretched thin by commitments in Europe, Asia, and cyberwarfare capabilities, some lawmakers are skeptical about adding another multi-billion-dollar program to the military’s balance sheet.
Still, others argue that the F-55 represents necessary long-term planning. With China rapidly expanding its fifth-generation and unmanned aerial capabilities, the U.S. Air Force will need a new technological edge to maintain air dominance in the 2030s and beyond. Twin engines would give pilots greater confidence in high-risk, long-range missions, especially in contested areas like the South China Sea or Eastern Europe.
Not Just a Trump Talking Point
Critics initially dismissed the F-55 as a political soundbite. But its potential benefits—enhanced safety, longer range, and expanded weapons capacity—are gaining serious attention among military planners. While the F-35 has succeeded in delivering stealth and sensor fusion, it remains a compromise between multiple service branches with competing priorities. The F-55, by contrast, could be engineered with air superiority as its singular focus.
Whether the F-55 becomes a reality or fades into the long history of abandoned fighter concepts will depend on the coming year’s defense budgets and emerging global threats. For now, it serves as a reminder that the evolution of military aviation never stops—and that the skies of the future will likely be dominated not just by stealth, but by survivability and adaptability.
Sources:
-
Business Insider: Trump pitches a twin-engine ‘F-55’ version of the F-35
-
Business Insider: Trump says he told the Pentagon to make a better, 2-engine version of the F-35
