Well, it didn’t take too long. I had a feeling that Tucker Carlson was going to get his good friend Joe Kent to sit down for an interview to discuss the fallout from his resignation, as well as his views and points on the Iran War. It is a long-form interview, so grab a cup of coffee when you sit and watch it. But it is extremely informative and makes the case for why Kent just had to walk away.
The interview itself starts with Tucker showing a previous interview from two years ago with Kent, asking him what he thinks the repercussions would be of an attack on Iran. And Kent called it perfectly then. I bet in a million years, he never thought he would be sitting down two years after the fact, discussing not hypotheticals but actual war.
In the interview with Tucker, Kent highlighted his resignation from the National Counterterrorism Center, saying he could no longer support a potential war with Iran, which he argued posed no imminent threat. He also said there was no intelligence showing Iran was about to launch a major attack.
In a very bizarre, and interesting turn of events, it looks like the revenge plot against Kent has already started. When you upset the swamp, or the Jews, or whoever the puppet master is of said play, they threaten your freedom, and sometimes even your life. And now, in just one day, they are looking right at Joe Kent for the “Signal Leaks”.
In March of 2025, a private Signal group chat of top U.S. officials accidentally leaked sensitive details about a planned airstrike in Yemen. The chat included precise timing, weapons systems, and targets, and a journalist was accidentally added, prompting a public scandal. The use of Signal raised major concerns since it wasn’t authorized for classified info, leading to federal investigations. There was never talk of Kent being “the guy”. Well, there is now!
Joe Kent is currently under FBI investigation for potentially sharing classified information, though he has not been formally charged or accused of being the source of a 2025 Signal group chat leak. While he participated in the chat with senior officials, there’s no public evidence linking him directly to the leak, and the investigation remains open without a formal accusation. Some reports suggest he was sidelined from intelligence briefings months before his resignation, and certain right-leaning sources have labeled him a known leaker. However, there’s no official evidence, formal charges, or confirmed FBI findings tying him directly to the leak.
