Membership Dispute Inside Disneyland’s Most Exclusive Venue
An Arizona couple has lost a costly legal battle against Disney after trying to regain access to Club 33, the private membership space inside Disneyland known for its exclusivity and strict rules. The dispute stemmed from their removal in 2017 and a lawsuit that ultimately resulted in roughly $400,000 in legal expenses.
Expulsion and Allegations of Rule Violation
Scott and Diana Anderson of Gilbert, Arizona, were removed from Club 33 after allegations that Scott Anderson was publicly intoxicated inside Disneyland. The couple disputed the claim and argued that the incident was misinterpreted and connected to a medical issue. Disney maintained that the behavior violated Club 33’s conduct policies and justified termination of membership under its contractual authority.
What Club 33 Represents
Club 33 operates as a private dining and hospitality club inside Disneyland with extremely limited membership and significant financial requirements. Members are subject to detailed behavioral standards, and the company retains discretion to revoke access when those standards are not met.
Lawsuit and Financial Fallout
Following their removal, the Andersons filed a lawsuit seeking reinstatement into the club and financial damages related to their loss of membership. The legal dispute stretched on for years and escalated in cost, ultimately reaching an estimated $400,000 in legal spending.
Court Decision and Outcome
A jury ruled in favor of Disney, rejecting the couple’s claims and upholding the company’s decision to terminate their membership. The verdict reinforced Disney’s contractual authority to enforce Club 33 rules and revoke access when violations are determined to have occurred.
Broader Implications
The case underscores how private membership agreements in exclusive venues carry strong enforcement power, with courts often deferring to contractual terms that allow organizations to determine eligibility and conduct standards.
